Task 1 IELTS Writing Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK (1974 – 2002)
The line graph gives information about how many goods was transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, there was an increase in most of the goods transportation methods except rail. In addition, the percentage of goods which was transported by road was the highest.
To begin with, 70 million tonnes of goods transported via road in 1974. Later, this figure fluctuated and increased by 30 to 100 million tonnes in 2002, which was 75 million tonnes higher than that for Pipeline. Pipeline was the less popular transport in 1974, with 5 million tonnes. This number underwent a slight growth to 25 million tonnes in 2002.
Besides, the figure for rail was the same as that for water, at around 40 million tonnes each in 1974. Moreover, the year 2002 experienced a considerable rise in good transported by water, at 65 million tonnes. In contrast, the figure for rail remained unchanged until the end of the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-01 | lalo | 56 | view |
2022-07-03 | lanvy214 | view | |
2022-06-21 | missbiotechnology | 11 | view |
2022-04-17 | ulligadda sreeja | 67 | view |
2022-02-25 | lecongtuan | 70 | view |
- Along with the economic development, the environment of the world is being seriously polluted.What economic activities can cause harm to environment?What can be done to prevent this? 73
- The chart below show the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- TOPIC: The pie chart below show global Internet users’ favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013. 73
- Along with the economic development, the environment of the world is being seriously polluted.What economic activities can cause harm to environment?What can be done to prevent this? 61
- Some people think companies should employ old people to work as they have a lot of working experience. Others, however, think it is better to recruit young people.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...l, there was an increase in most of the goods transportation methods except rail. In ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, moreover, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86708860759 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64588000117 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7472889795 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.9 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217179517873 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107261380977 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076285644945 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160619599745 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656893280067 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.