The table below gives information about changes in mode of travel in England between 1985 to 2000
The table illustrates the number of miles was commuted by local people in England in the course of 15 years from 1985 to 2000.
Overall, we can see an upward trend of miles traveled during the surveyed period. In addition, people had the interest in travelling by cur most while taxis and bicycles were among the least attraction of transportation.
Look at the table for more detail, the number of miles in cur took the lead, at 4,806 miles in 2000, which was 1,600 miles higher than that of 1985. Followed by trains and other means of transportation, at 366 miles and 585 miles ,respectively in 2000.
It can be seen that while walking and bicycle witnessed a downward trend throughout the period surveyed.
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 84
- The table below gives information about changes in mode of travel in England between 1985 to 2000 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the interest in travelling by cur most while taxis and bicycles were among the ...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ansportation, at 366 miles and 585 miles ,respectively in 2000. It can be seen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 596.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8064516129 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65541874274 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 164.7 283.868780488 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0464506788 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130811487237 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647814496356 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563221060523 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789717828346 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639477379449 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.