Is travel a necessary component of education or not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge or not?
Recently, the importance of travel in education has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative consequences of travelling?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the travelling is not beneficial for education, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational system standpoint, academic performance is bound up inextricably with life experiences, which indicates they lead to both university and personal experience. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between general knowledge and source of information as well as an exponential increase in academic achievement. Their academic criticism was impressiv. consequently, my empirical evidence ptesented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of international travelling is correlated positively with not only different cultures but also another countries.
Within the realm of sociaeconomic, without the slightest doubt, internal travelling attribute to economic benefits, in taht it would come down to greater revenue, language skills, and academic research. A salient example of such attribution is limited knowledge, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take human capability for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoints sitting at home problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to netural talent, long-term memory, and even different places. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the travelling in education.
To include, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the travel is a necessary component in education. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-09 | azzitta | 88 | view |
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 80
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantageous? Discuss your views and give opinion. 88
- Education is the biggest barrier to my learning – Einstein. What do you mean by this? And do you think Einstein was correct in saying that? 88
- How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...Their academic criticism was impressiv. consequently, my empirical evidence ptesented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes, 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82876712329 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3031598626 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681506849315 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4150557373 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216174840342 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549579792058 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563417771119 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102119220795 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305311601229 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.