The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the changes took place in the village over 80-year period, starting from 1930.
It can be seen that the village was transformed in terms of both facilities and infrastructure. The significant change can be found as most of the land used for agricultural purposes vanished to make way for housing areas.
In 1930, there was only a few of houses located alongside the main road which ran through the middle of the village, while farmland covered most of the northeast and southeast of the area. By 2010, most of the farmland had been converted to residential areas, as shown by the erection of more houses on both sides of the main road. Additional roads were also built to provide easy access to people living this area.
In terms of the village facilities, the shops located the west of the road disappeared while the post office nearby remained unchanged. It is also noticed that the primary school was expanded and the large houses to the west of the school was transformed into a retirement home.
- The diagram shows the consumption of renewable energy in the USA from 1949-2008. 78
- The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005 33
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 67
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82485875706 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59024606954 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.683739915 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979932276705 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423425617534 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347231224729 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611968913059 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340298412452 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.