The map shows the development of an area from 1962 to present today.
The pictures show the changes that have taken place in the Meadownside Village and Fonton area since 1962.
It can be seen that the Meadownside Village has been merged with Fonton area. The most significant changes could be found in terms of both transportation and local facilities.
In more details, in 1962, there was only the road running from the west through this village, while there was railway road passing through Fonton. In 1985, this road has been converted to the main road and extended to connect the village with Fonton. The main road remains unchanged today, but the railway line has been extended to the west where the station has been built.
Regarding the local facilities, a housing estate has been erected to the west, along with a leisure complex and a super store in the south. Currently, along with the merging the Meadownside village and Fonton, a hotel has been constructed in the north of the station and in the south, opposite the station, lies a business park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | mifas meleraroth | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | mifas meleraroth | 78 | view |
- Goods transported in UK (1974-2002). 56
- TOPIC Nowadays online dating is becoming more popular What can be the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 78
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 57
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88823529412 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41879177136 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.572755103 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881277937991 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430183676338 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055678043948 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668143676535 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637058375317 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.