The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table given illustrates the information in terms of the monthly family earning for four categories of products and services in five countries, namely France, Germany, UK, Turkey, and Spain.
Overall, the largest proportion of household monthly income in each country went on food, drinks, and housing whereas the other categories have lower percentages.
Regarding the revenue on food and drink of household, Turkey and Spain have a higher ratio, about 36%, and 31% respectively. Following the UK, at 27%, Germany, at 22% and France, at 25%. By contrast, the income in the housing of household in France, Germany, and the UK is slightly higher, around 31%, 33%, and 37% respectively than in the other countries.
It can be seen that Germany had the highest percentages of national household income for clothing and entertainment, about 15% and 19% respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for the UK is the same in the revenue from both clothing and entertainment, roughly 11%. Followed Turkey in these two categories, 12% for clothing and 10% for entertainment. Income on clothing in France and Spain are witnessed a small rate, 7%, and 8% respectively. However, these percentages nearly double in earning from entertainment, 13% in France and 15% in Spain.
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 75
- The two pie charts given compares the proportion of people who commuted to the university by five different means of transport over the course of 5 years from 2004 to 2009. 84
- the table below describe victim by age group offense categories in Venezuela 1999 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22167487685 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01903334743 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.122936084 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197034754792 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769799011083 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455057913783 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120345640685 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340318149665 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.