Leisure Activities of Europian Adults
The graph presented reveals a slight difference of what European adults do during their leisure time
in 1985 and 1995. it is evident that the existence of computer and games significantly influence
people spending relaxation time in 1995.
In 80’s, watching TV was the most time-consuming leisure activities people spend with 32 per cent of
total free time a day, followed by hanging out for eat with 23 per cent. Subsequently, talking with
friends and with family were the common activities with percentage of 21% and 18%, respectively.
Meanwhile, others activities were spend 6 per cent.
On the contrary, adults live in 1995 were still spending their 30 per cent of their free time, a quite
drop from 1985, watching TV. However, computer games tempted adults to more spend their time on
it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of percentage has happened to talking-with-friend
activities from 21 per cent to 26 cent, besides adults spend less time talking to families with markedly
decrease of percentage to only 7 per cent, as well as for eating out.
A fascinating fact that more than a half of leisure time activities adults mainly spend is interacting
with screen (TV and Computer) rather than with people in the real life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-01 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
2023-10-10 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
2023-09-30 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
2023-09-29 | Ng Anh Thu | 56 | view |
2023-09-29 | Lee Daisy | 84 | view |
- Difference Job between Man and Woman 73
- Plastic Surgery in Korea 78
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 73
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...g their leisure time in 1985 and 1995. it is evident that the existence of comput...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ely. Meanwhile, others activities were spend 6 per cent. On the contrary, adults li...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 96, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...g their 30 per cent of their free time, a quite drop from 1985, watching TV. However, comput...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 12, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...to more spend their time on it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of per...
^^^^
Line 10, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e spend their time on it with 27 cent. in the meantime, a gradual rise of percent...
^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...iend activities from 21 per cent to 26 cent, besides adults spend less time talking...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, still, well, while, as for, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86364339867 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4776805036 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.38176352705 320% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179471353488 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930565951696 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529950705671 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769934463033 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853501434339 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.