The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The number of times that Australian adolescents consumed three types of fast foods-pizza, hamburgers and Fish and Chips over the course of 25 years, starting from 1975. Overall, Fish and Chips experienced a steady downward trend while pizza and hamburgers had an opposite trend.
In the beginning of the period, Australian teenagers ate Fish and Chips nearly a hundred times more than the other two foods. Despite that, over the following decade, the figure of consumption for this fast food fluctuated, it dropped to slightly over 80 times in 1975, then rose again to nearly 100 in 1980. After that, the figure started to gradually descended, its lowest was below 40 times in 2000.
In contrast, pizza and hamburgers did not have high consumption rate at first, with both of their figures were under 10. However, the number of times hamburgers’ were eaten escalated significantly in the subsequent years, stood at 40 times in 1980 then doubled to over 80 times in 1985, finally became the most eaten fast food by the end of the period. For Pizza’s also rose, yet was more moderate than hamburgers’. It reached a high of over 80 times in 1995, and then leveled off afterwards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- El Nino is the name of a warm ocean current that affects weather patterns on both sides of the Pacific Ocean. The diagrams compare normal conditions in the Pacific with El Nino conditions. 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80078735213 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1919650331 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139054337992 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594003898566 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776367031945 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107237765299 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588858287607 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.