Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Manufacturers and supermarkets should cut the usage of packaging in daily shopping. Apart from this, customers should take this responsibility by avoiding using packaging. While retailers could have a positive impact on this matter to some extent, the role of customers is more significant.
The main reason that manufacturers and supermarkets should get involved in reducing the usage of packaging because they are responsible for producing such packaging as plastic bags and plastic bottles, which are convenient and comfortable for take-away products. If these retailers no longer produce packaging, customers’ demand will accordingly be minimized. Besides, packaging could pose environmental problems such as pollution because it is often a daunting task to recycle them. For example, plastic bags are non-biodegradable materials, which can be reused over and over, however, because of its durability, they could last for centuries until completely decomposed.
Alongside the influence of manufacturers and supermarkets, customers also play an integral role in the reduction of packaging. The more people continue to purchase products, the more packaging is produced. This does not mean that they need to stop buying products but try to become less dependant on the packaging. If customers decide to cut the consumption of packaging, retailers would find no purpose to produce them. For example, since Vietnamese citizens have been aware of environmental issues, the usage of plastic bags is significantly minimized and instead, they tend to use their lunch box or fabric packaging, which is more eco-friendly.
In conclusion, although the responsibility of cutting the usage of packaging belongs to many manufacturers and supermarkets to some extent, it completely depends on the demand of customers to solve this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | quan quan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | macydo | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Mr.Strange | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | Ania | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individuals and to the society they live in To what extent you agree or disagree 95
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Do you think this is a positive or negative development 82
- In some countries young people are living in richer and healthier condition but less happy What are the reasons What might be done to solve this issue 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
... buying products but try to become less dependant on the packaging. If customers decide t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, however, if, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68363636364 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28422223707 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4664977654 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21777274793 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848529440252 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050966905937 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151424686968 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524980350637 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.