Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle give you opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle give you opinion.

The problem of some people suggests that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the former latter proposition appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most proponent one stems from the fact that we agree are this statement because all humans should to them have one car in everyone family. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that car fall very pollution in earth. The many people to sick with pollution Needless to easy all these merits stand in a good bad stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some more merits demerits but bone of the crucial effect is that now day’s car very important for people because the many people save in car. Cars need to sometime people have accident when use to cars. Besides humans use to car any problems but some people drive to car drinking every this many people have accident. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favors of this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that benefits drawbacks of some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. Are indeed too great dire to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-19 komalpreetsingh 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user komalpreetsingh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and not encourage alternative vehicle. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...people have accident when use to cars. Besides humans use to car any problems but some...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, so, thus, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91984732824 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45244081278 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8135084633 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1538461538 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372562942922 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145474615265 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193958916698 0.071462118173 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25052227096 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105067900777 0.0609392437508 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.