line chart
The line chart illustrates four categories in terms of the amount of acid rain that emitted in UK over a 17-year period.
Overall, it is clear that the total amount of acid rain emissions in the UK fell considerably from 1990 to 2007. Another noticeable trend is that the most dramatic changes were seen in the Electricity, gas and water supply sector.
In 1990, under 3,5 million tons of acid rain were produced by electricity, gas and water supply, compared to transport/communication and domestic were similar at about 0.7 million tons each. However, the amount of acid rain release by electricity, gas and water supply plummeted over the next 17 years, reaching only 0,5 million tons in 2007. A similar trend can be seen in Domestic and transport/communication, with the figure hitting above nearly 0.3 million ton and around 0.7 million ton respectively at the end.
Similarly, there was a gradually decline in the amount of acid rain emissions by the other countries from over 2 million ton in 1991 to approximately 1.3 million ton by 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | denistran85 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | trungtrung | 56 | view |
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 67
- Line 11
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period. 67
- the pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduate and postgraduate 78
- Essay topics: The table shows the number of miles of passengers traveled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005. It also shows a projection of the year 2015 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...ly at the end. Similarly, there was a gradually decline in the amount of acid rain emissions by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 177.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98870056497 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23484689211 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5558965421 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0564251655864 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384007108265 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940621472851 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672012439464 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116395968847 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 78.4519038076 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.