It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on
people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believe that states should give aid to their own citizens instead of assisting people in other countries. While it is true that it is necessary for the governments to support their local residents, I would argue that they can provide help for individuals coming from other nations.
To begin with, there are several reasons why governments should help their local citizens. Firstly, it is clear that a great number of individuals in their own nations have to encounter many difficulties. For example, people in mountainous areas face several problems such as unempoyment, shortage of food, fresh water or low quality heath care. Therefore, these people need to be given aid by the states which might improve their living standard. In addtition, when receiving help from the governments, citizens will have better life. This might decrease social evils and contibute to the development of the nations. If residents lead a miserable life, they are more likely to commit crimes such as robbery or theft.
However, I would argue that it is possible to support people in other countries. First of all, because of participating in international organizations such as United Nations, each country has to conduct missions to support the others. For example, in 2018, many Vietnames doctors left for South Sudan to join UN peacekeeping mission. Moreover, governments can supply their aid for the nations suffering from natural disasters. Taking Japan as an example, this nation received finacial aid, food or medical aid from other countries after being hit by a big earthquake in 2011. This might consolidate the close relationship among nations.
In conclusion, while government should assist their local people , I think that they are likely to give aid to citizens of other countries.
- dưeqr 11
- The chart below give information about USA marriage and divorce rate between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the year 73
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend? 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not localpeople. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local peopleto visit these places? 73
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can just learn much from books, films and the Internet. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
It is believe that states should give aid to their ow...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that it is necessary for the governments to support their local residents, I woul...
^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ernment should assist their local people , I think that they are likely to give ai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21527777778 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78322461257 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8585482484 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168530718575 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606459277964 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604111206734 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129181113536 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438163793291 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.