The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014
The pictorial shows contrast the ratio of books read by gender at Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014. A glance at the chart reveals that the percentage of books read by male and female growth gradually in the beginning of the sequence. Unfortunately, from 2013 onward, female readers experienced a rapid decrease while male continued to upsurge until the end of given period.
To begin with, the number of references accessed by female that stood at just above 20 percent of the averages in the initial, continued to leap to reach a thousand of copies in 2013 onward before it dropped rapidly in the end of sequence to eight thousand. Contrary, printed work read by male, although it only raised slightly in the first year, somehow it experienced a considerable escalation to approximately 80 percent of the population, i.e. 14000 readers in 2014.
- The two maps below show an Island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilitiesSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsTo what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph bellow shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in United Kingdom in 1970, 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...population, i.e. 14000 readers in 2014.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97916666667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76719337635 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0330809605 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248144465981 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143455489336 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157970130932 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19419228103 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116401980914 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.