Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In order to introduce this topic I want to explain some key points in regards to how the interaction of students and the professor has changed during the recent years. In many ways the use of technology has been in raise not only in the workforce but rather in other areas, specifically in education and how lectures and discussion forums can be delivered faster and reutilize on further classes. This is crucial on how we can decide whether we want many or almost no lectures at all and also how we can scale discussions on vary topics virtually.
In my old days of college (almost 15 years ago) students prefer to have many lectures as possible due to outdated books and almost zero possibility to have a good bandwidth connection to the internet having the discussions with the assistants of the professor in a very old fashion way, that’s being said, pretty much you have the only and one opinion of the assistant without a proper discussion on why or how such matter was explained before on lectures. In mi personal point of view discussions on the main topics of the course are far more important than the lectures itself and I will get deep into this with a different perspective that I have nowadays after a lot of self-training and online courses on the internet. Human beings are related to have a deep sense of community to achieve goals, something that is missing sometimes on the classroom, therefore lot of students prefer to accumulate as much information as they can, even sometimes not sharing any specific details founded on other related matters or source of information. Having a good time discussing points of view and different angles to synthetize and summarize information is one of the most effective skill to comprehends a good amount of lectures and more important, due to the fact of learn to learn discussing with other class mates, can sharp your mind more efficiently and increase quickly the manner we digest difficult lectures. That is why discussion forums, specifically internet based forums are one of the best tools to learn from others, make mistakes, share information and basically interact in a faster way rather than only submitting questions or request to the professor or his assistant.
However some people might say that internet discussions are only for religion/politics arguments or for sharing useless information or even just hate to one others but I disagree on it based on my own experience and many others. When you just rely on college time based situations the interactions can be very slow or reserved on short times, some people can missed these or have a lack of interest even during lectures. To a certain extend they can be right but with a proper platform and with having some students being delegated to admin tasks all of the class can be benefit of it and even the professor or the assistant can interact faster and better sending different quizzes or more in depth lectures or related one that sometimes for some reasons cannot be discussed or analyze during lectures. There is a general agreement that technology and the internet can make things easier and quickly for such large audience, the ones that as an example are present in college.
To conclude, this essay has addressed on a different perspective how lectures/discussions can be addressed in college and even in contrast on how many students can think virtualizing our interactions sometimes can be very beneficial to our learning success path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...topic I want to explain some key points in regards to how the interaction of students and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1282, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to discuss'.
Suggestion: to discuss
...tant, due to the fact of learn to learn discussing with other class mates, can sharp your ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t to the professor or his assistant. However some people might say that internet dis...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one other', 'an other', or simply 'others'?
Suggestion: one other; an other; others
...seless information or even just hate to one others but I disagree on it based on my own ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...rest even during lectures. To a certain extend they can be right but with a proper pla...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...students being delegated to admin tasks all of the class can be benefit of it and even the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, even so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 13.8261648746 268% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2897.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 590.0 407.700716846 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91016949153 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92848004997 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84735724198 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461016949153 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 934.2 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 20.1344086022 223% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.4976116173 48.9658058833 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 222.846153846 100.406767564 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.3846153846 20.6045352989 220% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244453492546 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855347404748 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497288947767 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140847275018 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533784478913 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.4 11.7677419355 207% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 58.1214874552 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 10.1575268817 205% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.09 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.0537634409 199% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.247311828 205% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.