TPO 23
The lecture and the reading discuss the declining of the yellow cedar trees. Although the passage claims that some theories would explain the reason for declining the yellow cedar trees, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that some insects such as beetle attacked to the yellow cedar trees and killed them. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the healthy yellow cedar trees were generally much more resistant than other trees. He explains that healthy yellow cedar trees produce saturated toxic liquid. This chemical liquid safe the trees from attacked insects. But, unhealthy yellow cedar trees could not produce this liquid; hence, insects barked to the trees. So, before attack beetles, the yellow cedar trees became disses.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that bears were eaten the yellow cedar trees as their food so that they killed trees. However, the professor argues that the yellow cedar trees were declining both vast area and some islands. But, In the islands bear did not live so that bears could not cause for the yellow cedar trees' die.
Finally, although the reading passage says that climate change is a reason for declining the yellow cedar trees; in contrast, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the yellow cedar trees were living both high and low elevate. In the high elevate the temperature was colder than the lower elevations. But, we can see the yellow cedar trees died in the low elevate which the weather was warmer than higher elevate. Therefore, the cold temperature was not a reason for declining population the yellow cedar trees.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 30 80
- TPO 40 83
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.229390681 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13788992893 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9465890371 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38912366352 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173118517203 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474102852919 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266788459399 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413634758702 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.