In some countries, the no. of shooting increases because many people have guns at home. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of shooting which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this nation. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that many people have guns at home for safety. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that guns safe the human without shooting. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certain overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that guns have many disadvantages like human shoot the animals for their fond of. Besides, human kill human in anger. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of shooting increases because many people have guns at home are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Yadwinder randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | cccchinu | 77 | view |
- Whether design if building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work. 85
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 77
- technological access to online music 77
- university penalize the students 80
- family in order to reduce the traffic 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6620921648 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1869939957 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195148098052 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654144885295 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933707842915 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136784182616 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076771710745 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.