family in order to reduce the traffic
The importance of ownership of cars should be restricted to one person family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that traffic increase day by day in my countries. Consequently, traffic is crate the pollution. Another pivotal aspect of this trend mostly people very useful to cars. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects that traffic pollution is very harmful for all individual. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of pollution and traffic congestion are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-29 | vanessagalvis90 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | vijaymehta31 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12440191388 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77812903975 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593301435407 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7444747754 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3636363636 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172510662056 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560051138981 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822553408255 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903096631234 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382450252592 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.