The main reasons for study among student of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The bar charts given below describe the amount of comparison the main reasons for study among student of different age groups and amount of support they received from employers. Overall, it seen that the reasons for career was the largest number in under 26 age groups. While the reason for interest was the popular reason in over 49 age groups. Then the amount of employers support was the biggest also in under 26 age groups.
In under 26 age groups, the reasoning study for career and received employers support was the popular reason, for career had value around 80 and by employers support had value around 63. While in over 49 age groups, the highest value reasons for study was for interest. However the reasons for career had fallen from under 26 age groups to over 49 age groups, while reason for interest had grown from under 26 to over 29 age groups.
In contrast, employers support was lowest received in 30-39 age groups, while it had went up as employees get older over 49 age group. In opposite, employers support had fallen in 26 to 30-39 age groups. At value around 63, employers support was the highest of the other age groups. Then at about 35, it was the smallest of the other age groups.
- Average household expenditures by major catagory 56
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- The main reasons for study among student of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 67
- The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets 67
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey received from employers. Overall, it seen that the reasons for career was the...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...lue reasons for study was for interest. However the reasons for career had fallen from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver 49 age group. In opposite, employers support had fallen in 26 to 30-39 age gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18192140914 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.365740740741 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4306498335 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410829490025 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202662586134 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183815626836 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324674853362 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162852015787 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.