Some people think that big international sporting events are not worthwhile for the host country. Do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that large international athletic competitions are not cost effective for a country conducting the event. I partly agree that in terms of finances the conduction of these kind events may not be profitable.
First of all, preparation for a huge sport event frequently includes construction of new sport objects such as arenas, jump ramps, swimming-pools and Olympic villages. Additionally, security measures should be strengthened as many international tourists are arriving during the competitions. Thus, a hosting country waists a huge amount of money for preparations from the budget. Moreover, there is no guarantee that the profit from arriving tourists to will cover the expenses. In fact, the conduction of such events as Olympic Games brings losses to the budget.
However, in long term hosting a large athletic event may attract more tourist after the end of a competition. This is because many people around the world will be aware about the hosting country due to advertising campaign. Thus, the profile of a hosting country will be increased which is beneficial in terms of economy and number of future tourists arriving to the country. For example, cities, which host the Olympics, can be assured of a persistent increase in recognition and tourism. Barcelona, Sydney, Beijing have all seen this from hosting the Olympics. As well as this, the several years of planning and investment will help create jobs and can revitalise depressed cities.
In conclusion, hosting a major sporting event may be unworthy in the short-term; meanwhile it can bring many social and economic benefits in the long-term. In my opinion, pros and cos of conducting massive athletic competition should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | Mariamirabella | 93 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | khan0229 | 65 | view |
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion? 78
- You work for an international company and want to resign your job Explain Why you want to resign When you plan to leave What you liked about the company Decision the corporate ladder division intrinsically procedures colleague 84
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
- Many people nowadays tend to marry and have children in their thirties rather than at a younger age Is this a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 518, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Beijing) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...and tourism. Barcelona, Sydney, Beijing have all seen this from hosting the Olympics...
^^^^
Line 13, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly considered on a case-by-case basis.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36071428571 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99632215033 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.914903477 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184849684539 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625201230634 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039462018598 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114311804629 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292837244809 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.