As people become increasingly more dependent on motor cars, the public transport systems tend to run down. This has serious consequences for both existing communities and new communities, which are spreading farther and farther from town centers. Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of more dependency on motor cars and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many tat public transport systems cannot be highly beneficial after this increasing tendency, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that this could have negative consequences for communities living far from town centers, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support spreading public transportation. At first, personal motor cars are faster and more convenient due to their private space. However, running more motor cars can bring many disadvantages for people. For example, wasting time in crowded streets and highways snarled up with cars can make people lat in their works.
In addition, people have to pay more money for fuel for petrol cars than cheap tickets for public vehicles. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of transportation system machines such as bus and train are more reliable and affordable than motor cars.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of increasingly use of personal vehicles far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for the existing societies, but also for new communities in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society.How far do you agree with this statement? 77
- school children nowadays are not playing more sports compared to their parents in their childhood Do you agree or disagree support your ideas with examples 84
- Nowadays the most high-level jobs are done by men, should jobs be reserved for women by the government? What are the effects of this? 80
- Some people believe the purpose of education is to create future workforce and good members of society. Other people believe the purpose of education is to fulfill people's lives. What do you think is the purpose of education? give examples from your real 72
- Has there been any recent invention that you think proved either beneficial or detrimental to the society?Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of more depende...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tat seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much tat', 'a good deal of tat'.
Suggestion: much tat; a good deal of tat
... a heated debate. Although contested by many tat public transport systems cannot be high...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can make people lat in their works. In addition, people have to pay more mon...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iable and affordable than motor cars. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45414847162 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00624496996 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668122270742 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2860498343 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309859787721 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104541521665 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461547838961 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1676981014 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454524015904 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.