Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without the shadow of doubt job plays a prominent role in our life and occupies a huge amount of everybody's time. Job is how we obtain an income and provide for our family. The more we work the less the time we have to allocate for other purposes. I personnaly prefere to work for long hours but only Three days a week than just five days but with spending less time at work.
First and foremost, by working three days per week the time that a person has to spend with the family is more since his or her freetimes are longer. When we work for shortet hours the duration of each freetime will be less and as a result we prefer just to stay at home but having freetimes with longer periods lets you spend more time with the family especialy when our relatives live in another city. For example, My father has to work five days in every week and albeit he might have the same offtime from work than the time if he would have worked three days per week, we can not visit my grand parents. My grand parents live in another city which needs a five hours drive to reach it so when my father comes home we can not just drive to pay them a visit since he has to be peresent at his work the next day. We only go to their home occasionally only on holidays and consequently we do not have enough time to spend with them.
Another reason one should take in to account is having to spend less time at work means being able to take part in other activities such as workshops. Mostly it is impossible to do two jobs on the same day so we usually plan to do one in one they and another in the following day so when someone attend to his job one day he can not do anything else but with working on only three days, there will be left plenty of time to do other things. For example, I am working in a company for three days and at the same time I study at the university and also I am conducting a reseach. Since I work from saturday till Monday and on Tuesday and Wednesday I attend the university and on thursday and friday I allocate my time mostly to do research. I am able to fulfill all these defferent responsibilities only because my job has the flexibility to choose when to work and I have chosen to work only three days a week.
To wrap it up, I am agree that people should be able to work three days per week since it can help them to spend more time with their families and also they will be able to plan for other activities such as education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support 66
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had worked'?
Suggestion: had worked
...e offtime from work than the time if he would have worked three days per week, we can not visit m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 297, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attends'.
Suggestion: attends
...er in the following day so when someone attend to his job one day he can not do anythi...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... days a week. To wrap it up, I am agree that people should be able to work thre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, as to, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.13807531381 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18265313789 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412133891213 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2229441377 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.866666667 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8666666667 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368997261032 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150447237691 0.076458572812 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869312500974 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249326367974 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582787198565 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.32 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.