The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table demonstrates forest area in millions of hectares in six specific places in the world, namely Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania and South America from 1990 to 2005. Overall, the number of hectares varied differently in each year.
From the year 1990 to 2005, forested land in some areas rose. Start with Europe, in 1990, it had 989 million. Then in 2005, the number slightly increased to 1001. The same pattern went with Asia, although the number of trees had a small drop, form 576 in 1990 to 570 million in 2000, it grew again to 584 million in 2005.
On the other hand, the other areas fell. While Oceania saw little drop, from 199 in 1990 to only 197 million in 2005, Africa and South America had a considerable decline. In 1990, the area of trees in Africa was 749 million, but in 2005 it was 691 million. It was also the case of South America, from 946 in 1990 to 882 million in 2005.
There was one place that remained the same number over the years, North America. Though the forested land fell from 708 to 705 million, it had not changed in the next five years of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 56 | view |
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people say it is a waste of time to plan for the future and that it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- What are the causes and solutions for poverty 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46078431373 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08759080545 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7508730072 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124156373764 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536851519005 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423348056435 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092859189584 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430773841476 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.