The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems?
It is true that the gap between the rich and poor is growing wider in many regions of the world. While the problems that result are complex, fundamental solutions based on expanding education should be adopted to tackle this problem.
Increasing levels of poverty and rising wealth inequalities impact on the economic growth of a country and the security of its citizens. In economic terms, the existence of a large number of unemployed or low-paid workers directly affects domestic businesses, such as local shops and factories. As nobody has money to buy their products, these businesses are themselves forced to close, creating further unemployment. In terms of public security, without the means of obtaining money through work, the poor may turn to crimes such as drug trafficking, prostitution, robbery and violent attacks on others. Youth unemployment has, in particular, been linked with rising crime rates.
Governments must, therefore, expand educational opportunities to benefit all their citizens, in order to reduce the gap between rich and poor. The provision of a better standard of schooling in slum areas of cities and in poor rural regions would enable children to reach a higher level of educational attainment. Grants and scholarships could be used to help students to remain in education for longer and gain qualifications. In particular, vocational education could be expanded, helping poorer children to learn trades. In construction, engineering, and agriculture, a highly educated workforce will be needed in the future, and skilled workers will be able to command high salaries and enjoy a decent standard of living. In addition, work opportunities improve, crime rates will fall.
Thus, dealing with the problem at its roots, by expanding educational opportunities, the authorities would be able to reduce the gap between the wealthy and poor sectors of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | mohsina | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | xbear307 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | vongocson | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | quynhan1995 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of men and women who did various free time activities in England in 2006 49
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Famous actors and some professional sports people can command a very high salary Some people think that this is fair because salaries should be based on people s gifts and talents Others however believe that a person s salary should be based on their cont 73
- Many food are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and ecomically Do you think the advantages outweigh its advantages 78
- Children learn best by observing the behaviours of adults and copying with them. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ns. In economic terms, the existence of a large number of unemployed or low-paid workers directly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 729, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and enjoy a decent standard of living. In addition, work opportunities improve, c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in particular, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43581081081 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00864463963 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8572052947 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177667733482 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600184686025 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717012946039 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129951571234 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906165294766 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.