The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare a wide range of approaches of eliminating hazardous waste products in three communities. It can be clearly seen that burying underground is the most popular method in United Kingdom and Sweden whereas Republic of Korea would rather recycling.
In Republic of Korea the most significant percentage of discarding such materials is recycling (69%). Destroying by underground with a substantial difference amount (45%) stood in second place. Incineration is the least popular item of list (2%).
In Sweden 55% of waste products are destroyed by underground which is the highest proportion of chart. The contribution of recycling and incineration is almost one third of Korea respectively (25%) and (20%).
On the other hand the largest number of perilous products in United Kingdom like Sweden are buried which contributes 82%. Dumping precarious products at sea and chemical treatments are other approaches with equal share were responsible for 16% of disposing which are not prevalent in other two continents. The least common type of ways is incineration (2%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | Vahideh_abd | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that childrenSpend watching television 69
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. what are the advantages and disadvantages of both situation? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'recycle'
Suggestion: recycle
... whereas Republic of Korea would rather recycling. In Republic of Korea the most si...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd of Korea respectively 25% and 20%. On the other hand the largest number of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42603550296 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0311455859 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9250561978 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104597244888 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411546179937 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059103632838 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641697325899 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326441580369 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.