Urban forest
Passage illustrates the importance of urban forest. Forest can be saved by using legislation. While lecture states that in past such program was not successful. Speaker casts doubt on author in regards to urban forest legislation and points in the passage by giving specific examples and reasons.
Firstly, he points out that as per the author laws should be enforced on development. Mature trees should be saved by law. According to speaker this is misconception, in reality, in past law was not much successful. Reasons behind this was complicated language of law. this was not understood by community. Consequently, legislation was not applied properly. Thus he unequivocally negates the information of passage.
Secondly, the speaker opposes the information given by author regarding collection of funds. To maintain forest of city funds needed. This should by collected from people in the form of tax increase as well as private fund collection. This is quiet contrary, speaker reminds that in past low funds were generated from privet donation. Furthermore increase in tax will be helpful. We should work on it.
Thirdly, he denies validity of the point that was averred in the passage. Public should be aware regarding benefits and importance. Benefits like enhancing area and because of that pollution will be reduced. Speaker contradicts by saying that, this method will be successful if it implied correctly. Details of benefits should be reached to public.
Hence in conclusion, after this holistic analysis, speaker lucidly substantiates his points of view with cogency.
- #6 If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 3
- Pablo alto building usage theories 85
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 60
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rest can be saved by using legislation. While lecture states that in past such progra...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...cessful. Speaker casts doubt on author in regards to urban forest legislation and points in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aker casts doubt on author in regards to urban forest legislation and points in t...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d this was complicated language of law. this was not understood by community. Conseq...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
..., legislation was not applied properly. Thus he unequivocally negates the informatio...
^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ds were generated from privet donation. Furthermore increase in tax will be helpful. We sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...efits should be reached to public. Hence in conclusion, after this holistic anal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43775100402 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91236385017 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 21.2450331126 47% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3141304139 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.8695652174 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8260869565 21.698381199 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.39130434783 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139818629932 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500596409615 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121791821164 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931505873248 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162533094384 0.0443174109184 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 53.8541721854 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.498013245 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.2008830022 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.