Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families.
Help from the government is unnecessary.
Nowadays, the importance of aiding by states has gotten lucid for everyone. In this regard, there is a controversial question asking whether people can find solutions for their difficulties with the help of their parents and supports from a governor is not essential. I am afraid, I disagree with the opinion which is expressing governments do not have a role in solving these kinds of issues.The reasons to substantiate my idea are explored in the following.
First, a lot of persons cannot spend enough money on facing their worries and the centers of power have to help them. To put on the other hand, some times, a man needs to provide tuitions of his son and the man's mother or his father are not able to prepare the money for him. Under such a circumstance, a leader of the country should pass a law to subsidize these men. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my mother who used his salary to fund me and my brother for continuing education. Once, he had to quit her job for a month, the government pays her salary for 30 days until she found another work. During this time she could devote a budget for our schools and be sure about our training. If the country commander had never given cash for her, we would not study for a period.
Second, some kinds of problems are harmful to society and families require contributed to a charity or knowledge of other institutes for encountering them. To be specific, a girl who addicts to narcotics is in a dangerous situation and the government should start to control the condition of her if not, this event can be epidemic and has bad consequences. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home. My friend has participated in some sessions about how to end using the drug. A year ago while he was trying to accept his favorite major in a university a guy suggested to him the drug and he addicted to it. However, now, governments had arrested the guy because of making my friend addicted also holds events for guiding him on how to start his new life. This example demonstrates the positive effects of a state in destroying addiction.
By and large, I do believe families could not solve all problems, lonely. Since some difficulties need the money and subsidizing is a considerable issue and other problems like addiction can be epidemic and should control by police and the centers of the land.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-21 | Qq99 | 60 | view |
| 2020-04-04 | jeffhjz | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Amin Beheshti | 95 | view |
| 2018-04-10 | goharzay.m | 90 | view |
| 2017-11-14 | ardavan2 | 73 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...a role in solving these kinds of issues.The reasons to substantiate my idea are exp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, by and large, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62322274882 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71258191979 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561611374408 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1574039968 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.684210526 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151014777316 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423242640115 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696389499455 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108080582849 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955028748925 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.