Nowadays we can see definite signs of surplus production in almost every industry sector, and this is leading to environmental damage. What are some possible solutions to this situation?
Continuous downgrading of environment is the gravest concern of modern-day life. Industrial units in every market segment are over-producing today, and this certainly takes a toll on the local habitat. This development surely needs some prohibitive measures and efforts from both the government and industries can effectively address this problem.
State, to begin with, can play a crucial role in damage control. Government authorities can assure the proper implementation of pollution check policies at local production units. This surveillance by state will push industries to practice pollution controlling measures, strictly. Additionally, developing nations where levels of industrial pollution are significantly high, should enforce tighter laws against those contributing to environmental pollution. Several such laws have been introduced by Malaysian government since 2005, and this has resulted in a 2-degree dip in the average temperature of the country which was constantly raising due to industrial gases depleting ozone layer of the geographical region.
Industries, especially the ones where production targets are consistently crossed, should take into consideration the consequences of environmental damage they are doing. Every organization should consider environmental protection as their moral duty, and ought to contribute regularly for ensuring well-being of the mother nature. One way they can do this is by keeping production targets to a limit where industrial waste produced is not a threat to the surroundings. Furthermore, they should continuously research for the technology that can minimize the overall waste produced by an industrial unit. Finally, initiatives such as tree plantation in the industrial neighborhood can help drastically in reducing the pollution of the area.
In conclusion, It is evident that extra production is surely damaging the natural habitat and local governments and industrial sectors can certainly come up with some potential remedies for the problem in discussion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | sumitsharma1708 | 73 | view |
- Environmental problems ore loo big for individual countries and individual persons for address. ln other words, we hove reached a stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree wi 78
- Some people spent a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this is a good or bad thing? 73
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar when compared to the past What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 88
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,give details of your study plansexplain why you 73
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,give details of your study plansexplain why you 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9795221843 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28431578705 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.595095215 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236670489481 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804956993072 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502372874478 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148060433316 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306845805508 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.