leadership -TPO 38
Throughout history, finding everybody talent has been one of the most important concerns of human beings. Recently, there is a hot debate about the source of leadership. Some people believe that leadership is a talent and cannot be acquired, while others intensely disagree with this idea. I strongly agree with the former statement that leadership comes naturally, and both of education and learning have nothing to do with being a good leader. In what follows, I will try to elaborate on my standing point through two different outstanding reasons.
First cause coming to mind to substantiate my viewpoint is concerned with the matter that all good leader are not taught previously. For reaching a conclusion about this issue, the best way is to investigate history. In the history, most kings, presidents, leaders, and rulers gain their power without any education. Usually, they were some ambitious people who find their way to culminate in their expert. For example, Trump (current president of the United State) had not any political experience before he become the president. But, his political party understood his ability in ruling and giving orders. Now, based on the Trump’s tweets, he is one of the best presidents and rulers all over the world. There are many other examples of good leaders who are the same as Trump.
Another equally remarkable reason is that education may just enhance your ability. It is obvious that training any ability could give you somewhat of that skill. But, if you are not enough good in a career, you would not earn much of that. For instance, there are many ordinary soccer player who may train and practice more than Messi. But, they cannot reach the capacity of Messi in playing soccer. Messi has is so much clever in his area of expert. This example is correct for other fields. Leadership is a skill, and undoubtedly you can enhance and enrich your leadership capability. However, eventually, you may not reach the peak point of this capability because you do not enough natural ability in this expert. Hence, education could not make a huge difference in a person ability.
Based on the discussion, it can be concluded that leadership is a natural ability. This notion is verified by not only the history of good leaders but also disability of education in a huge enhancing of any skill. Even though all the aforementioned point to my view, a key issue that must be mentioned is that this deduction cannot be used as a prescription and some counterexamples might exits. Finally, I recommend that an investigation should be done on all the college students to find the potential leaders among them because leadership is a talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...lly, and both of education and learning have nothing to do with being a good leader....
^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...anding reasons. First cause coming to mind to substantiate my viewpoint is concerned with the matt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun soccer seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much ordinary soccer', 'a good deal of ordinary soccer'.
Suggestion: much ordinary soccer; a good deal of ordinary soccer
...n much of that. For instance, there are many ordinary soccer player who may train and practice more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'players'?
Suggestion: players
...nstance, there are many ordinary soccer player who may train and practice more than Me...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them because leadership is a talent.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98888888889 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71449788459 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1402225162 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1481481481 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25925925926 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083087552726 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254732776568 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522133307659 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575159915853 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039947624226 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.