More and more people are buying ready to eat foods instead of cooking themselves. Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Instead of cooking at home, consumption of fast food has become extremely popular these days. Although there are some advantages of this, I believe the detrimental impacts of having processed food for a long time are far greater than the benefits.
Considering the modern-day busy lifestyle, it is common for people to buy more and more ready to eat foods. Admittedly, it is quicker to have fast food rather than cooking at home. Moreover, as a result of immense marketing and publicity campaigns of fast food companies, people tend to believe that there are health and other nutritional benefits of having such foods. Consequently, they avoid cooking and eating processed foods on a regular basis. Nevertheless, having processed foods can cause a number of problems in people's health and financial aspects compared to home-cooked healthy diets. It is a fact that people are spending a substantial amount of their earnings on eating junk foods out-side on a daily basis.
It is necessary to take into account that long term consumption of fast food can be detrimental to health. As a matter of fact, nowadays, children are addicted to such meals. Consequently, their health-related issues such as obesity, sleepiness, and lack of concentration have been increased rapidly. Moreover, family cooking is always healthier than out-side food and in fact, cooking time can be easily utilised as quality time with all the members for the family. For example, during weekends, if families can cook their weekly meal together, they would be able to save money, time and have good home-cooked food during the whole week. Which is essentially a much beneficial option in order to have a better life.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of having fast food in a busy lifestyle, the health and financial benefits which we can have in the long run are far more important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | virtualpathum | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Karthikielts | 61 | view |
- You are having a graduation party next Saturday night You have invited 50 people to celebrate at an outdoor barbecue evening which may continue into late into the night Write a letter to your elderly neighbour In your letter explain what will be happening 83
- Giving Pocket Money to Children is very common in many countries Discuss both the advantages as well as disadvantages about the practice and what is your opinion about it 61
- Students are asked to work a short time without pay as part of their education Is this more of an advantage or a disadvantage to Student and Company 78
- Many students take part time jobs while studying at the University Is this a bad or good idea 72
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 640, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...home-cooked food during the whole week. Which is essentially a much beneficial option...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12052117264 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82448930196 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524429967427 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3020214351 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28569218059 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961812166668 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914196687602 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183464014643 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866932244146 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.