Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Over past few decades, various types of music have become increasingly popular for recent years in particular. There is a thought that one of a good way to bring people from diverse background together is music. I strongly agree with this because this such a type of arts has become a big part of the world community.
Firstly, the language barrier may not take place in the taste of melody, it depends on personal character and feeling to enjoy any kind of that. Also, the performance of the artists that once appeared to the sight of audience is one large factor. In the present days, music is not sorted by what language it is written in. Actually, people separate types of music by their melody and rhythm. For example, nowadays concerts such as Korean pop music festival are held around the world. The oversea fans in United States, China, and Europe are now connected by these tours. Therefore, music can possibly bring people in each continent together without the need of lyric translation.
Moreover, our world has become widely connected by the technology known as internet. Social media plays vital role in that development of technology. To be specific, songs are now available online in YouTube or any other social networks. The approach to a band is now become at ease, it is just on your fingertip. Unlikely in the previous centuries, every reach to their favorite band was difficult when internet had never been involved. Additionally, social network provides a space which will allow persons with the similar taste of tune from any place to gather. Therefore, music has been a great choice of bringing people from diverse culture and ages together.
In conclusion, this essay argued on whether music is a good way to gather people from different background. The is clear evidence that language and distance do not get involved in modern society music. Furthermore, the ease that internet provides leads to the more convenience each individual would have. I strongly believe that music has truly become the best choice of gathering people.
- The diagram shows a method of shaping glass containers 69
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females in Australia who were overweight from 1980 to 2010
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown
- Universities should be concerned with educating people so that they have wide general knowledge and be able to consider important matters from an informed viewpoint, and not simply prepare students for jobs required by society.To what extent do you agree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...nected by these tours. Therefore, music can possibly bring people in each continent together...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99421965318 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5588287028 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598265895954 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.3068079823 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2857142857 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4761904762 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24772695494 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663479303335 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866369053449 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148595501573 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423455376614 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.