Shops should not be allowed to sell food and drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advancement in urbanisation and industrialisation, the ethics and morals of businesses have been compromised a lot. In the pursuit of profit maximisation, the businesses do not hesitate to compromise on the consumers’ health. In the recent phenomenon, the increasing tendency has been observed in the selling of unhealthy edible items in stores. In my opinion, the shops should not be authorised to sell unhealthy food and drinks because of the issues it brings for the people and the governments.
To begin with, people do not posses sufficient knowledge in differentiating between healthy and unhealthy food items. To clarify, at first, people often neglect the list of ingeridients mentioned on the products while buying any product. Therefore, they are not sure about the impact of the product on their health which they are consuming. Secondly, companies usually print symbols of the ingredients they use in the processing of consumable items. Hence, even people with a tendency to read about the products are not In a position to understand the properties of the chemicals used in the products.
Furthermore, unhealthy people put strain on government budgets. The governments have often limited resources to manage all the sectors of the country. Hence, the increase health budget due to increase in health problem will enforced governments to cut the budgets from the other project that can benefit the nations in the furture. For instance, many countries are investing in Artifical intelligence because of the potential benefit it entails for the nations. But, if govenrments have to spend more money in providing health facilities to the nation it can erode the future progress of country due to diversion of budgets to health sector.
To conclude, evidence mentioned above provide strong evidence that allowing shops to sell unhealthy items to consumers can increase health issues. Resultanlty, an increase in the unhealthy people will force governments to cut budgets from beneficial projects and invest in providing health facilities to the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | Rehan Yousaf | 69 | view |
- Shops should not be allowed to sell food and drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- Crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some peple think it is better for children to grown up in the city, while others think that life in the coutryside is more suitable for them. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places? 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 78
- Some people feel that global warming should be dealt with by governments Others feel that it is the responsibility of individuals in society to solve the problem Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng of unhealthy edible items in stores. In my opinion, the shops should not be aut...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enforce'
Suggestion: enforce
... due to increase in health problem will enforced governments to cut the budgets from the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39263803681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03998099283 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4682379551 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198680974613 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620354690694 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073123904508 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120133082933 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645062578553 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.