Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art is a form of expression and creativity, during ancient times art was given primary importance. Artist were praised by kings and were called to create beautiful palaces, the great Taj Mahal is a great example of the importance of art during the ancient time. But as science and technology has dominated the modern civilisation, people have pivoted and less and fewer people practice art which has caused a decline in arts as there is less scope and local artist find themselves to sustain themselves as they don't have a steady income. Thus, personally I agree with the fact fundings are important for arts to flourish but the involvement of government to fund arts is something which can have an adverse effects and threaten the integrity of arts.
The most important point that needs to be addressed when government is funding arts is: How is the fund going to be distributed? In a vast multi cultural country like India where each region has their own culture and their own art form. How will the government art form to support. It is difficult for the government to decide how to distribute the available funding? For example lets compare the art forms of two states Maharastra and Gujarat, If the government decides to fund the art of Gujarat the artist of Maharastra will not have any support. In addition to it the artist in Maharastra will adopt the works of Gujarat as they get to earn more money. Thus, this defeats the purpose of Government funding.
Instead of funding the government can give a platform for all the artist to showcase thier art and promote them. The local government can set up meetups where the government can urge citizens to engage with the local artist and learn about the various art forms practiced in their region. This will not only help the artist to make a living but also appreciate them which is far more important for an artist. The other problem faced is lack of ignorance of art due to globalisation and digitization, the government can also promote arts by including a rigorous art curriculum for students which will help to inclucate a sense of national pride for local arts.
- A resident of Coburn sent the following letter to the editor:"I strongly object to the proposed placement of walking trails in Coburn. Although thetrails will use land that belongs to the railroads, it is land that adjoining neighbors areaccustomed t 77
- "Allowing our children to spend hours a day IM’ing and employing social media is boundto impede their social skills as they enter adulthood and the workforce."Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim made above. Userele 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... called to create beautiful palaces, the great Taj Mahal is a great example of th...
^^
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hemselves to sustain themselves as they dont have a steady income. Thus, personally ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78319783198 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60448972923 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49593495935 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3848776264 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41674824846 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160521415494 0.0831039109588 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10539355997 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295174317103 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161451181749 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.