table
The table gives an overall view about how many hectares of land in different areas were forest between the years 1990 and 2005.
It is noticeable from the table that there were no significant changes about forested land in all six areas, with Europe remaining at the top forest builder and Oceania had the least figures.
In more details, there were 989 million hectares of forest in Europe in 1990. This number then experienced a sustained growth, reaching a record high at 1001 million hectares in 2005. In contrast, South America, although came second, had a small drop from a start of 946 million hectares to 882 million hectares. Meanwhile, Africa's number, although was higher than North America at first, but declined gradually and even had a lower end with only 691 million hectares.
Of the rest two areas, while Asia used 576 million hectares for forest, Oceania's number was even smaller, with a mere 199 million hectares at the beginning. And these two areas almost remained their figures constant in the 15-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobiles phones in communication has negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. Agree or disagree 84
- Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think? 84
- a table shows monthly expenditure of an Australian family in 1991 and in 2001 84
- table 84
- process 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f forest in Europe in 1990. This number then experienced a sustained growth, reachin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01149425287 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34708027919 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7763510969 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821544746017 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388668805562 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677132543352 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777337611123 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784149272588 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.