Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of the that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to school work. Which of them two approaches do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern era in which people involve diversity things and jobs, parents have a finite time for their children. While some group mentions spending time just for school tasks, others suggest sports and games. I am in favor of the statement which mentions to spend time for physical critics like sports due to three points, improve children's abilities, decrease the negative energy and support children's physical and mental health.
First of all, children need other skills which advocate their future and are more the important than class materials. However, some group mentions to importance of the class material for children's future, other critics their point because children's future needs more strong skills and abilities than material which are forgettable. In fact, abilities like communication and sense of responsibility grantees the children's positions in the future. For example, my friend who his childhood spent times for sports had improved communication skills that altered him to a prosperous merchant in the future. Therefore, sports play a significant role in children's future than materials.
As a second reason, plenty of energy in the children should guide in the correct direction to have successful children and the sport maintain the spending energy in the right way. The negative points like spend energy in the school work converts to be happy children are expressed by some group while other cast doubt about happy children with spending more time on school tasks because of its cause to waste the youth energy. For example, my cousin as an aggressive child when started to sport after a while positive effect were tangible in his behavior. So, changing the negative power to positive can guide the children to be a successful person in their life.
Thirdly, children's health is vulnerable and easily damage that affect their life and future. Sports negative side like activities damage have suggested by critics, however, others uncover the wrong position in the class and doing school tasks affect negatively their mental and physical health like backache. As an illustration, research’s outcome proves that the group of student who spends more time playing game own high level of health, while other groups depicts the feeble health rate. As a result, playing games and sport support children’s heath that determines their future.
Consequently, I agree with the statement to refers the spending more time on physical activities base on three points, improving children's skills and abilities, positively leading the children’s energy and advocating children's health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | zizi.dream | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
- tpo36-integrated 3
- Tpo 45 3
- Tpo30-Integrated 75
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of the that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for example, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40487804878 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66750445396 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485365853659 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9064963325 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.352941176 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231999459802 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874208590356 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521459603087 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149396912755 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421499623317 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.