The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries.
The provided chart depicts the different ways of waste management among 15 states in the European continent.
Overall, it can be said that the landfills and the incinerators still play a leading role in the more the half of the countries under examination. According to the study, all the Southern European countries treat their garbage using the landfills, and the United Kingdom, Finland and Ireland follow this trend. The incinerators process almost 60% of the waste in Denmark and Luxemburg, and France uses almost equally those systems and the landfills.
Speaking about the most eco-friendly method, only a few countries are able to process the majority of the garbage by recycling or composting. Austria is leading the rank with more than 60% of wastes recycled, and Netherlands is in the second place with slightly less than 45%. Finally, it is worth noticing that, while "other methods" of waste management are almost insignificant in all the countries, they are quite important in Germany, where around 10% of the garbage is processed in those unspecified ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | Muhammed_10 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Limeluminous | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lls, and the United Kingdom, Finland and Ireland follow this trend. The incinerat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, still, while, speaking about, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85527513836 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6839555303 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107484913966 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468299766298 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035357466004 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796201293043 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359317042749 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.