Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Is the understanding of past useless in order to be a good leader, and therefore should focus only on contemporary events instead? Or, on the other hand, is it necessary to understand the history, if leaders want to identify the correct causes of contemporary situation and therefore be helpful in order to find some future solution?
First of all, understanding the past can highly benefit those in power or learership position. Moreover, every statement or businessmen should understand it in order to be able to correctly apply her or his agenda in practice. For example, understanding the country's realities might make work of any politician much easier, and understanding history should be even desirable. Applying any reform without correct understanding of history of the country would lead to deleterious effect afterwards. Applying reform of interest rates without understanding of history of high interest rates of the country, or its dependence on exports could lead to many difficulties afterwards. History is affected the present, what subsequently creates causal relationship. In order to change the future, we need certainly know how first variable came to contemporary state and what what the cause of it. There is nothing more, only correct understanding of history which can solve this enigma. Only by understanding the history of globalization, we can opt for global tax reform or global ecologic agenda
However, relying on history should neither be excessive. Understanding historic development of Czechoslovakia can be highly beneficial in order to understand how the countries are performing nowadays, or what lead them to this contemporary state. But reality of hundres years ago has certainly evolved and using history to explain what people might think nowadays, as one of the most important clues for a good leader, can be distorted by excessively use of history. If one leader wants to know, why people in one region have more extreme and nationalistic tendencies than the other one, it is easy to find some fact from a long history which can buttress such a tendency. However, people have changed, and so on the opinion and realities, and therefore the reason for such tendencies can be easily found in contemporary propaganda of regional leaders, with no real catalysator in the history. Moreover, this tool is used by plenty of populistic leader nowadays and have strong deleterious effect on the wellbeing of citizens.
Probably the best position would be the middle ground taken and the only way how to not fall into the trap of excessive use of the history is critical thinking. People should analyse and question the worlds event in critical way, and try to get the best possible conclusion. Only by questioning and continual thinking, it can be correctly explained, when the history correctly explains the predilection of the employees or citizens of certain company or country respectively, however, as world is perpetually evolving, critical thinking should be used to find the frontier of this effect.
The answer to this statement is certainly not one sided and we can agree with it to certain way. The way in which history is beneficial for the contemporary leaders depends only on the level of their critical thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | zzk81 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- The city of Winston has two large department stores: Namen and Roscoe. Namen is known for its high-end designer fashions, while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options. Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the gr 55
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 69
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. 55
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 861, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: what
...variable came to contemporary state and what what the cause of it. There is nothing more,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... People should analyse and question the worlds event in critical way, and try to get t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2767.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26045627376 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0144160801 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475285171103 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1971523141 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.761904762 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0476190476 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128962882996 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469397731391 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468537640568 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677944833947 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411158273354 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.