Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e., splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance.
Recently the phenomenon of differential education and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of splitting students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that different classes can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, different education can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of academic performance, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient classes are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, differential schooling can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of time-consuming classes are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient students. Hence, the predicted outcomes of dismal academic performance are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of differential education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of splitting students prove the significance of academic performance, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages. 88
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend 85
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalized world. Explain what is it and the cause of it. How do you define "lazy" journalism and what is the cause? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99069767442 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38837767952 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646511627907 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9210410992 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249596716159 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077461505525 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579116301544 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135607344334 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457909449475 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.