TPO42 Integrated
Both the reading and the lecture discuss solutions to prevent birds from trying to fly through clear glass. The author of the passage provides three solutions; however, the professor in the listening challenges the arguments made by the author. He claims that none of these will effectively prevent birds from being injured.
First of all, the author suggests that by substituting traditional glass with one-way glass, people inside the building can see outside, but birds will not able to see inside. However, the speaker in the listening cast doubts on the idea by saying that one-way glass actually reflects the sight outside the building just like a mirror, such as reflecting the sky and trees. Since birds cannot differentiate between a mirror and reality, it cannot prevents birds from being injured.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that by adding colorful stripes onto glass, birds will tend not to fly through that area, and thus the lens is not harmful anymore. Nevertheless, the lecturer contends that if birds find there are holes between stripes, in fact, they will try to fly through the holes. Furthermore, to make this method effective, the gap between lines should be quite small. However, this will darken the light in the building, which indicates that this is not a good idea as well.
Last but not least, it is stated that since birds fly in the correct direction by sensing magnetic fields, so installing human-made magnetic fields can change the course of birds. Still, the speaker rebuts the idea by implying that while it is true that birds use magnetic fields to fly, the magnetic field is utilized only for long-distance travel. By contrast, when birds fly in a short distance, they only use their eyes and sense the light. Consequently, it has no effects on preventing birds from getting harm.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, in fact, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04262295082 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48201268988 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56393442623 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3920203273 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486018660265 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155526892061 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902168888026 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273600739447 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478684392277 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.