It is suggested that everyone should have a car, a TV and a fridge.
Do the advantages of this development for society outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a suggestion that it is necessary for each person to possess items meeting their fundamental needs such as a car, a TV and a fridge. While this tendency brings clear benefits to some extent, I believe that there are more drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several advantages of having a personal car and the modern facilities such as TVs, bridges. Obviously, most people living far away from their workplace often need the availability of own vehicles to travel on a daily basis, leading to the diminution of journey time on the road. Moreover, owning a TV might be a perfect choice of recreation because offering a variety of entertaining channels including Star Movies or Netflix, which satisfies viewers’ personal preferences. Additionally, the possession of a fridge results in saving a significant amount of time spent on shopping for food on a regular basis. All covenience above allow heightening people’ ways of life in today’s society.
On the other hand, I opine that the disadvantages of those cutting-edge kinds of equipment are greater than their advantages in terms of both environmental and individual levels. Firstly, the dramatic rise in possessing a private car is attributed to the one of main causes of air pollution. Therefore, people are likely to suffer from respiratory illnesses or even a lung cancer due to the high exposure to exhaust fumes. From personally perspective, convenient and comfortable commodities provided by well-known manufacturers are prohibitively expensive, so this could put a financial burden on people in specific cases. For example, fresh graduates with an unstable job, but tending to purchase luxury items by credit cards. Thus, it is easy for them to get into serious debt when losing their jobs.
In conclusion, although the possession of the modern items as mentioned above brings some considerable benefits, in my opinion the advantages overshadow disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2017-01-19 | khacthoibc | 78 | view |
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 77
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.To what extent do you agree or disagree? - 3 78
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they were on holiday in 2012 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34516129032 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15348113808 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651612903226 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1820474687 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159219664804 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484117042306 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525524917536 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941211815648 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546262527522 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.