The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
The bar chart compares how many hand phones were shipped worldwide by the leading five phone makers from 2009 to 2013.
It is clear that Samsung and Apple witnessed dramatic increases in their sales over the period shown while Nokia saw an opposite trend. Additionally, Samsung also became the most popular brand in the year 2013.
In 2009, the number of mobile phones sold by Nokia was around 450 million units, and this figure more than doubled that of Samsung. The four years later, however, Samsung overtook Nokia with its sales reaching to the similar figure of Nokia in 2009. By contrast, Nokia experienced a substantial decrease in the number of cell phones sold to nearly 250 million units.
Turning to three remaining categories, Apple had the lowest sales just about 50 million units in 2009, but its figure was more than five times as high as that in 2013. In comparison, there was significant fall in the sales of LG to roughly 75 million units while ZTE saw a slight rise in its sales to nearly 60 million units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 74
- The pie charts illustrate the result of a research in terms of the cultural and leisure activities that boys and girls take part in. 11
- fish canning 92
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27174675819 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6713212084 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226256176267 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999316084941 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625843940757 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140303359348 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059668349292 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.