Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about possible to maintain a permanent human presence on venues, which professor in the lecture talks about the balloon-like station that it makes situations for people can live on it. The author of reading believes that there are three problems that cause the human cannot live on Venus. The lecture challenges the statements made by the author. He is of the opinion that these problems can solve by creation Balloon-like station.
First of all, the author suggests that the Venus has a high pressure (90 times greater than earth). It is important that this pressure can crush humans and space crafts that have decision landed on the Venus. This problem is challenged by the lecture. He says the pressure at the height of 50 kilometers above Venus’s surface is not different with the pressure’s earth, therefor humans can land on the Venus without be any crushed.
Secondly, the writer contends that the Venus has no water and oxygen for humans who want to live on it. The article notes that humans should import water and oxygen from the earth that this issue is impractical. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that humans can produce a water and oxygen with materials that have on Venus. He elaborates on this be mentioning that the water and necessary oxygen can be produced from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid which both of them exist on Venus’s atmosphere.
Finally, it is stated in the article that Venus gives just 40 percent of the sunlight. The author establishes 60 percent of sunlight blocks by denser layer of carbon dioxide, so humans cannot run their machines because their solar power cells has a little energy for operating them. The lecture, on the other hand posits that the sunlight 50 kilometers above Venus is sufficient. In that height, a sunlight through clouds and a sunlight reflected by clouds can be collected by people to use in the station.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | LKL | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | rosedudu | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | iscaxap | 76 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in big city .Do you agree or disagree ? 70
- My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific details and examples to support your answer 47
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. the source of quackers 3
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Parents are the best teachers.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t cause the human cannot live on Venus. The lecture challenges the statements made ...
^^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lected by people to use in the station.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93272171254 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55248564577 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5463695862 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870529616237 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415556014867 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540713359921 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565697966662 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395260105509 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.