do you agree or disagree with the following statement? we should use clean energy, even though the triditional energy sources are less expensive.
Without any shadow of a doubt, the role of energy sources in our lives cannot be overstated. This is because energy sources have served countless multi-faceted functions such as providing fuel for transportation, generating electricity to name but two. With this in mind, a plethora of people holds the conviction that clean sources must be substituted with the traditional energy source. Others, on the other hand, take a radically different viewpoint and assert that it is not beneficial to use clean sources of energy instead of traditional ones. As far as I am concerned, the virtues of clean energy sources significantly outweigh those of traditional energy sources. The reason why I believe so is manifold, among which the diminishing environment population and the renewable ability are considerable.
To begin with, it is vivid that because of extensive usage of fossils fuel for different reasons namely transportation or generating electricity for diverse factories, world now confronts with the issue of air pollution which not only has negative impact on the health of human beings but also it is dangerous to life of all kind of animal. this problem by the growth of urban and increase in population will become more and more serious and is accompanied with mortal consequences. The advocates of clean energy sources believe that the only possible solution for diminishing pollution is substituting clean energy sources with the traditional ones. By doing so, undoubtedly pollution resides in the atmosphere will be decreased immensely. for instance, today we have this technology to generate power from the ocean’s tide. scientists by precisely locating turbines in the ocean in a way that is utterly harmless to aquatic animals can produce a great deal of clean energy which is not detrimental to both human beings and the environment.
Another privilege of clean energy has to do with renewability. The undisputed fact about traditional energy sources such as fossils fuel or gas is that these resources will cease at some point and since virtually all aspect of human’s lives depend on these resources if people do not discontinue the extensive utilization of fossils fuel, it will be impossible for people to continue their life properly. Moreover, it took billion years for these sources to form and utilize by people in a widespread way; therefore, it is sensible to conclude that traditional resources are unrenewable resources. On the contrary, because of the availability of an immense amount of natural energy sources and the ability of renewability, people can, without cease, use these resources. Although it may be claimed that the cost of usage of clean energy sources as the main source for energy is significantly high, in my opinion, this cost in comparison to the cost which people should pay in case of loss of traditional resources is relatively low. In other words, substituting natural energy sources with traditional sources with considering the virtues of it, is thoroughly worthy.
In a nutshell, with all this taken into account, I strongly convinced that replacing clean energy sources with traditional ones will be beneficial for both human and environment, on the ground that by doing so environmental pollution will decrease and also because of renewability of natural resources, people can have access to effective energy sources for a great deal of time. The thing I am sure of is that as time pass and people become more developed, they understand the real value of clean sources and will be more eager to use these resources.
- what discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? we should use clean energy, even though the triditional energy sources are less expensive. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? watching television is bad for children. 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people would be happier if they had fewer possessions. 73
- people do many different things to stay healthy. what do you do for good health? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...angerous to life of all kind of animal. this problem by the growth of urban and incr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...atmosphere will be decreased immensely. for instance, today we have this technology...
^^^
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
...erate power from the ocean's tide. scientists by precisely locating turbines in the o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... their life properly. Moreover, it took billion years for these sources to form and uti...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a widespread way" with adverb for "widespread"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e sources to form and utilize by people in a widespread way; therefore, it is sensible to conclude ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3011.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 579.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20034542314 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99083985876 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455958549223 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 982.8 618.680645161 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9330058148 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.55 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.95 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225954968255 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918008872594 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617473363284 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164848588172 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222890539042 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.