the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The line graph illustrates data of energy utilisation in America from 1980 to prediction until 2030,it was reported in 2008.
Looking at the graph in more detail, it is evident that the amount of petrol in oil which was consume fluctuated from 35 units in 1980 to 30 units in 2004. After that it continuous increased to 47 units till 2030. Fuel of coal used 17 units in beginning year but it will consumed 30 units in the final year. Similarly, natural gas utilised increased from 20 units in the first year 225 units in the last year.
Turning to the remaining three data sets, the amount of nuclear which was used to four units in the 1980 as well as it slowly rise to 7 units till 2030.Similarly ,spend of solar energy was remain constant in all over the period.while, hydro power spend by fuel 4 units in the starting your overall it will increased to 3 units.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-15 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
2019-12-23 | Jass Rai | 78 | view |
2019-12-03 | Sakil | 78 | view |
2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
2019-11-01 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 75
- Thr graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 in 2007. 73
- In some countries and increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 61
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...t the amount of petrol in oil which was consume fluctuated from 35 units in 1980 to 30 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m 35 units in 1980 to 30 units in 2004. After that it continuous increased to 47 unit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'consume'
Suggestion: consume
... 17 units in beginning year but it will consumed 30 units in the final year. Similarly, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
... as it slowly rise to 7 units till 2030.Similarly ,spend of solar energy was remain const...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owly rise to 7 units till 2030.Similarly ,spend of solar energy was remain constan...
^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...30.Similarly ,spend of solar energy was remain constant in all over the period.while, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ts in the starting your overall it will increased to 3 units.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, similarly, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50314465409 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46346669752 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.5793291187 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139529465696 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900693303163 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107262964118 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146076576792 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125118550873 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.