Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisements in schools and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that great resources for public schools can be a plus that I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the general standpoint, exploiting children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, needing additional funding for placing advertisements in schools might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues.
To conclude, While there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being a captive audience for corporate sponsors far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoints thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give an example. 77
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 85
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 88
- Governments and international organizations are facing global problems. Provide solutions. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83196721311 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27756128163 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0128870436 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.3 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25071800187 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839423621632 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823893670321 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131893114168 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346211265747 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.