Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Is it true that teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn? I do not think so. What if a student does not have inherent ability to understand the subject matter ? or a learner is not studying hard enough or not paying sufficient attention during class? It's not a good policy to blame educators in these cases. What if teachers under this rule were motivated to be too easy on their students by offering below-average exams and tests or unethically grant students grades that they do not deserve just to avoid a cut to their wages.
First of all, pupils with math skills would find it fairly easy to pass math-related subjects, such as physics, whereas they might not be as good in literature classes. Under these circumstances, we cannot say it's the teacher's fault and it would be unjust to punish tutors financially for those students. In contrast, students with innate language abilities would do better on other classes, such as history and again holding the educational institution or liable for this is irrational.
One more point that's worth mentioning here is that some students are careless and do not help teachers to do their jobs. Although mentors might be putting so much effort to ensure that their students pick up the ideas and concepts to pass the course, some students could be too lazy or unreliable. Hence, it's not the right thing to make the teacher's salary dependent on how much this kind of students learn
However, tutors should be held accountable and their pay should be adjusted according to their performance. How would we do that ? A simple way to do that is by calculating the average percentage of students that pass the course with different mentors, then deciding a minimum target percentage that the teacher is required to achieve. For instance, if most teachers teach a class and fifty percent of the enrollees pass, this percentage should be the goal that the tutor ought to be responsible to accomplish. Another thing is to demand teachers to complete a number of specifically measured activities with students, and failure to execute these standardized lessons should negatively impact the teacher's compensation. On the other hand, school staff who adhere to the requirements should suffer no consequences. To sum up, In my opinion, teachers should be paid according to how much they teach and by comparing the teacher performance to her or his colleagues.
- MVC 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- the united states expansive national park system admission fees 86
- mvcc 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing games teaches us about life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...lity to understand the subject matter ? or a learner is not studying hard enough o...
^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ying sufficient attention during class? Its not a good policy to blame educators in...
^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nder these circumstances, we cannot say its the teachers fault and it would be unju...
^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution or liable for this is irrational. One more point thats worth mentioning he...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...is is irrational. One more point thats worth mentioning here is that some stud...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...could be too lazy or unreliable. Hence, its not the right thing to make the teacher...
^^^
Line 9, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ce, its not the right thing to make the teachers salary dependent on how much this kind ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on how much this kind of students learn However, tutors should be held accountab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 699, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ed lessons should negatively impact the teachers compensation. On the other hand, school...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 966, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r performance to her or his colleagues.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, then, whereas, another thing, for instance, in contrast, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98034398034 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76516983902 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542997542998 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4666628366 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.611111111 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364412692079 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120170244896 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112478476523 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224432871771 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833144392059 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.