TPO41
The reading and the listening have a debate on new regulations upon prodution of burning coal due to the harmfull effect of them to the environment. The penman puts forward 3 main theories that are disapproved by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that existing rules about the matter are adequate to be followed by the companies. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle, according to her, now regulations are not sufficient because of the significant dangeros that coal and other related chemical have. she mentions that new rules most effect new and old sites of coal mining.
Secondly, The author point out about the recycling process of coal ash which is a profitable part of the subject for production companies. The text added, new strictions may have a bad influence on consumers of coal ash and they refuse to buy the products. Conversely, the lecturer cast doubt on this assumption by saying an example of another type of material. Consequently, she take notices to Mercury which is a fatal subject despite that recycled matter can be sold easily.
Third, the reading passage proposes that increase in costs has unsuitable effect of electricity bills. On the other hand, the professor hold a different prespective. she believes that extra costs on bills is a better choice for society to reduce pollution and have clear environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...t coal and other related chemical have. she mentions that new rules most effect new...
^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...her type of material. Consequently, she take notices to Mercury which is a fatal sub...
^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...professor hold a different prespective. she believes that extra costs on bills is a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03493449782 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73661540966 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61135371179 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7816989616 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0833333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338362584836 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101337580479 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853922865127 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172014460565 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708335548797 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.