The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar chart compares the proportion of males and females from Australia who exercised regularly across different ages in the year of 2010.
It is clear that significantly more women went to do psychical trainings after the age of 25. We can also see that men were preferred to build their bodies compared to women at the age of 15 to 24.
Australian male youth between 15 and 24 clearly favoured building their bodies over women in Australia at the same age group, with 52.8% and 47.7% respectively. However, the scenario changed to the opposite at the remained age groups. From the age of 25 to 34, men were less active in working out, while almost half of Australian women enjoyed daily body training exercises. In the 35-to-44-age group, slightly less than 40% of men did their exercise regularly, comparing to 52.5% of women.
By the age of 45 to 64, the percentage of male physical activity went up to around 45%, whereas the proportion of women who did their physical training remained 8% higher. At last, the figures of the male and female senior citizens over the age of 65 from Australia did their daily exercise were almost the same, at approximately 47%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 82
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 153, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remain'?
Suggestion: remain
...f women who did their physical training remained 8% higher. At last, the figures of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 292, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...from Australia did their daily exercise were almost the same, at approximately 47%. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8137254902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59895932652 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2080428572 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335705574438 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139197961826 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765533726539 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205627333698 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538600926607 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.