The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
ielts writing sample
The bar chart reveals statistics about how many travelers used three separate types of airports, namely John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark in the New York city during a 5-year time frame from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, as can be inferred from the graph, there was an upward pattern in the figure for visitors who used these transports to travel over the course, whilst LaGuardia surpassed any other airport in the number of guests.
Looking at the graph in more detail, we can clearly see that from 1995 to 1997 LaGuardia almost always stood at the highest position with the sole exception in the year 1997, John F. Kennedy witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of visitors which exceeded that of Kennedy at approximately 50, followed by the second highest place, LaGuardia, at over 40. The interesting feature is that there was a similar trend in the number of guests in 1995 and 1996 in three airports.
In details, the proportion of visitors in LaGuardia reached a peak from over 40 in 1998 to nearly 70 in 2000 while this figure for John mildly fluctuated. Last but not least, Newark maintained at the same level of visitors over the course from 1998 to 2000 at 42.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-26 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | pma | view | |
| 2020-04-02 | john.slow | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | john.slow | 73 | view |
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta 84
- More people today are overweight than ever before.What are the primary causes of this?What measures can be taken to overcome this epidemic? 89
- Government should ban abortion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries.Why is this the case? Is it a positive development? 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72463768116 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42968756068 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6741451622 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168574539568 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796814744972 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348703059206 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105649366735 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439688332464 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.