The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart depicts the number of passengers travelling to three main airports of New York city from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that LaGuardia airport was the most used one in most years, apart from the year 1997. In addition, the number of visitors to all given airports experienced considerable increases over the period of 5 years.
In 1995, about 35 millions people used LaGuardia airport, which was nearly 10 millions higher than John F.Kennedy airport. The lowest number was recorded in Newark airport, which was over 15 millions passengers. Over the next two years, the number of people using Joh F.Kennedy airport rose dramatically to around 48 millions in 1997, making it the airport with highest figure in this year. Similarly, the figures for LaGuardia airport and Newark airport grew to about 42 millions and just below 40 millions respectively.
By 1999, John F.Kennedy airport’s passenger number dropped to just over 30 millions, but then recovered to around 43 millions in 2000. Meanwhile, the figure for LaGuardia airport climbed up to its peak of just under 70 millions in 2000. From 1998 to 2000, the number of people using Newark airport levelled off at just above 40 millions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-26 hoang tuan minh 67 view
2021-10-21 Khanhu010101 73 view
2020-09-10 pma view
2020-04-02 john.slow 73 view
2020-04-02 john.slow 73 view
Essays by user Khanhu010101 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...s nearly 10 millions higher than John F.Kennedy airport. The lowest number was recorded...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...years, the number of people using Joh F.Kennedy airport rose dramatically to around 48 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...millions in 1997, making it the airport with highest figure in this year. Similarly, the fig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...millions respectively. By 1999, John F.Kennedy airport’s passenger number dropped to j...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, then, while, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01477832512 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56047721777 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8916303337 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223509459315 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109716785498 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950749858689 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179378468576 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121661257974 0.0819641961636 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.