In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The progress of any field like business,education or politics is possible because of the practices they implement. These new innovative ways they follow for the development of their fields are decided by those who are in power at that instance of time. Here the claim suggests that those in power must step down after five years. I accept this statement up to a certain extent.
Let us consider in politics we had the same president and members of the house for the entire time. The ruling would become monotonous and they would not care about thinking about the new policies all the time as their power is safe irrespective of their efforts. Thus causing a hindrance towards development. However if we assume the power changed after every five years the leaders would be more vigilant to take useful steps for their denizens. Adding to that they might perform better because they would have to compete against their antagonist party.
For suppose if we take business into consideration the same idea of stepping down after every five years would not be effective. In general a business is started by a group of people who invest their time and energy to make it the best. Only they would understand this business better than anyone else as they have been with it from the beginning. So if they give their power to someone else after five years the business will not move towards progress as it takes time for the new person to understand the demographics of the business and take correct steps.
A field would progress if the power was given to different people after a tenure and in some other cases it would progress if it had a constant leader, it all depends on the field and how it works.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- Science is meaningless without religion.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should conside 50
- Some people believe that the most important qualities of an effective teacher are understanding and empathy. Others believe that it is more important for teachers to be rigorous and demanding in their expectations for students. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , education
The progress of any field like business,education or politics is possible because of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
... of the practices they implement. These new innovative ways they follow for the development of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ausing a hindrance towards development. However if we assume the power changed after ev...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7491638796 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47610926689 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518394648829 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6795414699 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176417977536 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689078568276 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711675406855 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118854360267 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546217682139 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.